Do the Thunder Need a Point Guard?

The Dallas Mavericks and Miami Heat will square off tonight in game 1 of the NBA Finals — a somewhat rematch of the 2006 Finals. I say somewhat because only four players (Dirk,The Jet, D. Wade, and Haslem) remain from those finals which the Heat won in six dubious games. Everyone is giving their finals predictions and frankly I didn't want to get lost in the crowd. So if you want a prediction look elsewhere. I have a more important matter to discuss anyway. A question that has been gnawing at me, lingering in my mind all week — do the Thunder need a point guard?

Yes, I am comfortable admitting Russell Westbrook has been on my mind this week. The truth is I'm worried about him. Look, I don't want to trade him or anything foolish like that. The man is allowed to have a bad series. I mean for God sakes the kid is only 21 years old! He was All-rookie first team in 2009 and All-NBA second-team this year. He averaged 21.9 pts., 4.6 rbs., and 8.2 asts this season, partnering with Kevin Durant to lead the Thunder all the way to the Western Conference Finals. He even recorded a triple-double (14 pts, 10 rbs, 14 asts) in game 7 of the second round against the Memphis Grizzlies, the first triple-double in a game 7 since Scottie Pippen in 1992.

The Thunder will be a playoff mainstay for years to come thanks to the young nucleus of Durant, Westbrook, James Harden and Serge Ibaka. Westbrook is quite arguably the third best point guard in the league behind only Derrick Rose and Chris Paul. He told Darnell Mayberry of the Oklahoman that he would love to remain in Oklahoma City.

"I definitely want to play here," he told the Oklahoman. "I love being here. I definitely would love staying here."

So what's the problem? Why am I worried?

I'm not worried because he took 20 shots a game against the Mavs, while shooting only 25% on shots outside of three feet. It's not because he had 24 assists and 24 turnovers in the Mavs series (a terrible ratio for a point guard) or because he took 50 shots in the final two games, both losses. It's not even that the one game the Thunder did win, Westbrook was benched in the fourth quarter because Scott Brooks was tired of his turnovers. None of those are the problem. Because they are correctable. Shots will fall. He's too damn talented for them not to.

Moving Westbrook off the ball could
open up the offense in OKC.

And therein lies the problem. Russell Westbrook is too damn talented. Too talented to handle the ball. He, like Durant, believes he can take over a game, make every shot. And theoretically, you want that in a player. You want him to have that desire, that will to win. But you don't necessarily want that in this case. Oklahoma City is a unique team. They are all supremely talented and yet all learning and growing at the same time. Durant grew up and blew up first and took the NBA by storm becoming a superstar with name recognition slowly equaling LeBron. Westbrook is catching up the only way he knows how to do things — fast. Oh, and don't look now, but James Harden is catching up to Westbrook.

Here's my theory: Too much talent is a great problem to have, unless one of the players is a point guard. Here is a list of the starting point guards who have won championships in the last 10 years:

Derek Fisher (4x), Rajon Rondo, Tony Parker (3x), Jason Williams, Chauncey Billups.

The two names that standout for me here are Tony Parker and Chauncey Billups. Both were told they couldn't shoot when they entered the league. Parker worked his butt off and now has one of the most consistent mid-range jump shots in the NBA, has three rings and a 2007 finals MVP to his name. Billups is a 2004 Finals MVP and is Mr. Big Shot, enough said. If Westbrook could dial back his speed and improve his jumper, the Thunder will be formidable for years to come. But is it that easy?

Westbrook is quite possibly the fastest man in the NBA. Should we really tell him to rein in his greatest strength? Should he work on his jump shot? Yes. He most certainly should. But I do not want him settling for 18-23 foot jumpers because he took 300 jumpers everyday in the summer. That's not his game. What is the alternative? Move him to two-guard ala Allen Iverson.

Westbrook is Allen Iverson only three inches taller and 27 pounds (of pure muscle) heavier. He is Allen Iverson if A.I. ever hit the weight room. Thabo Sefolosha (currently the starting shooting guard) is a serviceable two-guard and a defensive specialist in the Bruce Bowen mold. But imagine moving Westbrook to the off-guard spot. Plug in Eric Maynor as the starting pass-first point guard and keep James Harden in the Lamar Odom-I-should-be-starting-but-I'm-not-for-the-betterment-of-the-team sixth-man role. Now, you have an objective Eric Maynor deciding who should get the shot instead of Westbrook. Suddenly Westbrook doesn't have to hear the "You shoot too much!" garbage. He can just play his game. He can slash to the basket, he can shoot the ball, he and Durant can take as many shots as they want without the pressure of having to setup his teammates. It took a while, but this is offensive strategy is currently working in Miami. As silly as it sounds, they can become the next Wade and LeBron.

More of this please.

You are basically swapping Sefolosha for Maynor in the starting lineup. Maynor proved he can play against starter quality opponents during his 4th quarter run in game 2 of the western conference finals. Westbrook is athletic enough to guard most, if not all two guards in this league. Plus, now teams must keep an eye on both Durant and Westbrook. Imagine a pick and roll/pop with Maynor and Ibaka. Teams focusing on Durant hanging around the three point line will miss Westbrook slashing to the basket, or if the big man hedges the pick, Maynor will have an open Ibaka. Maybe a wing tries to help, running down in the paint to stop Ibaka's open layup. Now Maynor can hit the open man at the three point line (either an open Durant for a possible three or an open Westbrook with floor space).

Look, Westbrook doesn't have the traditional shoot-first point guard mentality. He has a win-first mentality, coupled with extreme confidence. He honestly believes he can get the best shot because he can get to the rim whenever he wants. He's that good. When he gets stopped, misses easy buckets, or gets caught in the air, he gets frustrated and creates unforced errors that may not be a big deal in game 64 against Toronto, but can make or a break a championship run in June. Westbrook had six technical fouls in the playoffs, he had nine in the regular season. His 1.3/1 assist to turnover ratio in the playoffs was simply not good enough and frustrated his teammates and even his head coach.

The Oklahoma City Thunder are so young and talented that they may very well win with Russell Westbrook at the point guard spot. He may develop a jump shot and the intangibles a point guard needs for his team to be successful i.e. pinpoint passing, limited turnovers, knowing who's hot/not and knowing who needs a bucket to get rolling. He could develop all those qualities. Me? I want to see the Thunder win a ring next season, mostly because I like them. I'm young like those guys. I want it all now. And I think the fastest way to the Larry O'Brien trophy is moving Westbrook off the ball so he could shine alongside Durant for the next decade.

Lakers Reportedly Have New Head Coach

Former Cleveland Cavaliers head coach Mike Brown has reportedly been offered the head coaching position for the Los Angeles Lakers, replacing the retired Phil Jackson, according to ESPN.com. Sources close to the situation told SI's Sam Amick that Kobe Bryant was "surprised" by the move and was not consulted during the interview process. Bryant is reportedly an avid supporter of assistant coach Brian Shaw, who was granted permission earlier this offseason to interview for a head coaching position elsewhere.

Brown compiled a 211-117 record in his five seasons with the Cavs. His defensive-minded coaching style and experience in managing a superstar may have attracted Lakers brass to him. He reportedly withdrew his name from consideration for the Golden State Warriors job, furthering the speculation that he will become the Lakers new head coach.

Brown is a 2008-2009 coach of the year with a deep pedigree, including two seasons as associate head coach with the Indiana Pacers and assistant coach for three seasons under the tutelage of Gregg Popovich.

Mike Brown is the defensive-minded head
coach the Lakers were searching for.

Still, Lakers fans will have legitimate concerns. Number one: he never won with LeBron. He was widely criticized in the playoffs for being outcoached by Doc Rivers in 2010 and Stan Van Gundy in 2009. Yes, Brown has experience in coaching and managing a superstar. However, it was widely reported that LeBron was coddled during his time in Cleveland. Does Brown have the personality to rein in players with strong personalities? Bryant mentioned in his exit interview that the guys took practices easy because he was not there to push them due to his various ailments. Can Brown instill discipline into a veteran unit with more championship experience than himself? Jackson demanded respect from the Lakers because he went through the wars in Chicago and LA. Eleven rings didn't hurt either. The Lakers will be unimpressed with Mike Brown's resume. How will they react?

Yes, Brown emphasizes defense, something the Lakers desperately needed, but Brown's simple, isolation-style offense was often criticized while in Cleveland. It should be noted that Brown has more talent in LA than in Cleveland so perhaps this concern is moot. We shall see.

If the reports are true, Mike Brown enters a high pressure coaching job with a rabid fanbase that expects championships. He didn't come through in Cleveland. He will have to come through in Hollywood.

UPDATE: Broderick Turner of the LA Times is reporting Mike Brown's contract would be in the $4-4.5 million range. The contract would likely be 3 years with a team option on the fourth with partial pay if he is not retained.

UPDATE 2: Mike Brown has agreed to a 4 year $18.25 million contract to become Lakers head coach, according to ESPN's Chris Broussard

Lost in the Shuffle: Blazers Oust Another GM

The Portland Trail Blazers shocked NBA insiders on Monday by announcing the dismissal of general manager Rich Cho. Cho was with the team nine months after replacing former general manager Kevin Pritchard following last year's NBA draft. The Blazers named director of college scouting, Chad Buchman their acting general manager and no timetable for a permanent replacement has been reported, according to Ben Golliver of BlazersEdge.

The abrupt firing, which has been discussed only in passing by the NBA media east of the pacific northwest, has led to a laundry list of questions regarding the chemistry between Cho and Blazers management, specifically owner Paul Allen. Adding to that claim, all assistant GMs and scouting staff have been retained by the organization, according to Golliver.

Despite solid offseason and mid-season acquisitions, Cho was dismissed
from the Blazers after nine months. (Photo: courtesy of The Oregonian)

Earlier this week a report surfaced that Cho was pushing for the suspension of shooting guard Brandon Roy following his complaints over playing time after game 2 of the the Blazers first round playoff series against the Dallas Mavericks. Paul Allen nixed the idea of suspending Roy. Blazers management deny that that particular rift led to Cho's dismissal. The Blazers have been kicked out of the playoffs in the first round for three straight seasons.

Stocked with young talent at nearly every position and an owner willing to spend in order to win, the Blazers general manager position was thought to be a top job in the NBA when Cho was hired away from the Oklahoma City Thunder after nine seasons as assistant GM. However, after former general manager Kevin Pritchard's rather peculiar dismissal last year (along with highly touted assistant GM Tom Penn) and Cho's firing just nine months into the job this year, future candidates must wonder if Blazers owner Paul Allen is looking for more control of the team or is simply difficult to work with, putting chemistry issues ahead of team performance.

Whatever the case may be, inconsistent management and front office turnover in Portland has turned this once attractive position into one of the more undesirable jobs in the NBA. The new GM must decide  whether to resign Greg Oden, how to handle Brandon Roy's ailing knees and somewhat prickly personality and find a point guard of the future.

Cho was praised for his trade that sent Joel Pryzbilla, Dante Cunningham, Sean Marks and conditional first round picks to the Bobcats for Gerald Wallace. Wallace played a large role in sustaining a season that was marred by injuries from key players like Greg Oden and Brandon Roy. The offseason signing of free agent forward Wesley Matthews was also praised throughout the NBA. Matthews had a career year and looks to have a bright future with Portland. LaMarcus Aldridge was named All-NBA third team under Cho's leadership.

Blazers president Larry Miller told Golliver that Cho was "shocked" to learn he was being fired but to Blazers management, the writing was on the wall as the season progressed. The Blazers finished the season with a 48-34 record.

"The fit between Rich and our team simply wasn't right," Miller told Golliver. "This was a tough move because I respect Rich and he was a good person with many skills. But it simply wasn't a good match."

Now the Blazers must endure more front office turnover, which often produces new strategies and new philosophies from the top, which often leads to player movement. The Blazers built a foundation around Greg Oden and Brandon Roy only to see it crumble to severe knee injuries. The front office managed to reload as opposed to rebuild due in large part to the additions of Marcus Camby, Wesley Matthews, Gerald Wallace and the emergence of LaMarcus Aldridge and Nicolas Batum. After being intricately rebuilt brick by brick, Portland fans don't deserve to watch their team crumble again — this time from the top on down.

Links with Blurbs

Here are some links from guys I read with blurbs that truly breakdown Oklahoma City's breakdown.

Jeff Fogle, Hoopdata: I'd feel like it's piling on to go through all of Westbrook's poor shooting spots again. I just wish this was part of the mainstream coverage. If an NFL quarterback kept having a horrible completion percentage in a series of big games, it would be mentioned. Heaven forbid AROD goes hitless in a couple of playoff games. Westbrook was 0 for 10 outside of 9 feet tonight. In what's supposed to be a jumpshooter's range of 16-23 feet, he's 15 of his last 56 going back a dozen playoff games. FIFTEEN OF FIFTY-SIX! He's 8 of his last 35 on treys, and OKC needs to keep up with Dallas from behind the arc.

John Hollinger, ESPN.com:  Not only did they punt the game; they almost certainly kicked away any chance of winning the series, too. Monday's 112-105 overtime loss to the Dallas Mavericks in Game 4 of the Western Conference finals put the Thunder down 3-1 with two of the final three games in Dallas -- a scenario only two teams in history have come back from (Boston in 1968 and Houston in 1995).

Berry Tramal, The Oklahoman:  In the last five minutes of regulation, Dallas outscored the Thunder 17-2. In the last 41 seconds of overtime, the Mavs outscored OKC 7-0. The Mavs played smart and possessed. The Thunder played reckless and stupid. Bad shots. Turnovers. Idiotic fouls. What-was-he-thinking decisions. A despondent Kevin Durant claimed youth had nothing to do with it.“This is basketball, man,” Durant said. “Our youth has nothing to do with what we were doing on the floor. We've showed we can play on this level.”Better hope he's wrong. Youth means you can grow out of this kind of choke. If youth has nothing to do with it, a game like this could scar the franchise.The Thunder lost its edge, then lost its mind.

Tim Cowlishaw, The Dallas Morning News: In all, Oklahoma City outshot Dallas from the field and had an almost absurd 55-33 edge in rebounds. For Dallas to win despite those deficiencies, it could only happen with defense.The Thunder committed 26 turnovers to the Mavericks’ 13. Dallas had three players — Kidd, Shawn Marion and Jason Terry — with four steals.

Johnny Ludden, Yahoo! Sports:  Nowitzki has emerged from all those losses a tougher, better player. Durant will eventually realize this. All the great ones take their lumps. Michael Jordan pounded his head against the Detroit Pistons. On Tim Duncan’s way to four titles, he was embarrassingly swept by the Los Angeles Lakers, lost another series to the Lakers with Derek Fisher’s .4 miracle and fell to the Mavs and Nowitzki in an epic Game 7. Even Bryant suffered two lean, embarrassing seasons when the Lakers rebuilt around him.The Mavericks are a motley collection of veterans united by their past playoff misery, from their coach on down. Rick Carlisle took the Detroit Pistons and Indiana Pacers to the Eastern Conference finals only to fall short each time. Jason Kidd lost consecutive NBA Finals with the New Jersey Nets and has forever struggled to get back.

Fourth Quarter Collapse Dooms Thunder

The Dallas Mavericks used a 17-2 run with less than five minutes remaining to force overtime against the Oklahoma City Thunder. The Thunder collapse bled into overtime where Jason Kidd hit a big corner three that took the life out of the Ford Center, as the Mavs stunned the Thunder 112-105. Led by the magnificent and acrobatic Dirk Nowitzki, who finished with 40 points, the Mavs ended the game on a 28-6 run to take game four and a 3-1 series lead in the Western Conference Finals. The Thunder will travel to Dallas for game five on Wednesday night.

Some key stats/storylines that you'll hear tomorrow morning:

• Russell Westbrook: 7-22, six turnovers
• Lack of effectiveness with the Westbrook/Durant pick and roll
• Jason Kidd and Shawn Marion's defense on Kevin Durant
• Youth on a big stage
• Dirk: 4 straight games with double digit points in fourth quarter/second 40 point game of series
• James Harden fouling out with 5 minutes left
• 17-2 run to send game to OT.
• 28-6 run after being down 99-84 with under 5 minutes remaining in regulation
• 55-33 Thunder rebounding advantage
• Thunder: 26 turnovers
• Dallas: 5-2 on the road this post season

Ask Me Anything!

I appreciate everyone who has read my posts so far. We blew by 2000 page views yesterday. I would love to hear what you guys have to say.

Please feel free to comment or ask questions regarding the NBA playoffs or just basketball in general at anytime. I would love to start a discussion, so submit your questions:

• via Twitter to @9450blog 
• email (anthony.calabro23@gmail.com) 
• my Facebook page (Anthony Calabro)
• submit a question in the comments area below.

I'll be happy to answer you and we can go back and forth. (I check this thing like every five minutes. I'll answer quickly).

This could be a total dud if no one comments/asks questions, so please when you are reading, feel free to chime in. Believe me, I am wrong quite often. Please tell me why.

Thanks and keep reading. I appreciate it!

Dirk's Historic Night Hides Disturbing Trend for Thunder

Don't get me wrong, the story here is Dirk. When you shoot 12-15 from the field, set a NBA record by going 24-24 from the free throw line and drop 48 points in game one of the Western Conference Finals, you should be the story. Today, the story is Dirk, his ranking on the all-time list, his hall of fame status, his comparisons to Larry Bird etc... But what are we missing? What is Dirk's historic night hiding?

"I bet the whole house Westbrook won't shoot 3 of 15 again," Kevin Durant said in his post game press conference. "Quote me."

KD35 may want to stay out of the real estate business. Westbrook has shot 28% (17-59) in four games against the Dallas Mavericks including last night's western conference final: (via hoopdata.com)

• 11/24: (4-13)



Facilitate young fella!

• 12/27: (5-15)
• 1/6: (5-16)
• Last night: (3-15)

Now let's take a look at shots by location in four total games against the Mavs: (via hoopdata.com)

• @ the rim: (10-22)
• from 3-9 feet: (1-12)
• from 10-15 feet: (2-7)
• from 16-23 feet: (4-15)
• from 3: (0-3)

Westbrook prides himself on putting his head down and getting to the rim. In the regular season, he shot 60% on shots at the rim. In four games against the Mavs, he is shooting only 45% (10-22). Tyson Chandler is more agile than most 7 footers in this league and his constant presence near the rim has affected Westbrook's performance. In four games, Westbrook is shooting  11-34 (32%) from 9 feet and in.

For a speedy, slashing type point guard like Westbrook, these types of numbers likey cause him to settle for outside shots. That is a win for the Mavs. From 10-23 feet, Westbrook is only 6-22 (27.2%).

There is obviously more to the Mavs win than just Dirk shot well and Westbrook did not. We all know Dirk is going to get his. Dirk can average 40 in this series and the Thunder can still win. It was not so much that Dirk dropped 48 on the Thunder, but the way in which he did it — high shooting percentage, getting to the line and staying inside the three point line.

The Thunder need to come up with a defensive game plan that gets Dirk out of his comfort zones. Have Serge meet Dirk at mid-court, push him to where you want him to shoot. Have the defense dictate the offense, not the other way around. If you are going to double, double hard and rotate fast because the Mavs have shooters at every turn.

If the Thunder bigs can't keep up with Dirk, I would focus my attention away from him and figure out a defensive strategy to stop J.J. Barea and Jason Terry from hurting you. Let Dirk get his. One man can't beat you. Even with Dirk's 48, the Mavs needed every one of J.J. Barea's 21. I don't expect 20 from Barea every night.

Now, Dirk can drop 40 a night and the Thunder can still prevail, but Westbrook can not shoot 28% for the series and expect his team to move on. Despite having the greatest scorer in the world at his side, Westbrook's mentality is score first. Shooting 28% while averaging 20 shots a night hurts your team. In four games against the Mavs, Westbrook's assist to turnover rario is 2.2/1. Good. Not great.

The bottom line is Dirk's stat line last night was so impressive, so rare, so beautiful, that it will likely overshadow today's story lines. Russell Westbrook may get a free pass from the media today, but not from this blogger!

Thinking Outside the Triangle

ESPN.com contributor Larry Coon took questions on Twitter regarding the Lakers' offseason. Here are just a few samples:

@Cizzle697: What about Pau or Bynum and the other guys for Hickson or Varejo, Sessions and Harris or Eyenga + one of Cavs 1st rd picks?

@Thad_singley: You think NO would accept Pau, filler and a first rounder for CP3?

@Dgtedford: Do lakers give up a combo of Drew + Pau/Lamar or does Drew + picks get it done? (for Dwight Howard)

The annual knee-jerk reactions are coming in furiously from Lakers fans. They want Pau's head ...er changes. Most Lakers fans are already looking towards the summer of 2012 — assuming they will pluck Dwight Howard from Orlando a la 1996 when they signed Shaq away from Orlando in free agency. Others believe Chris Paul, coming off his dismantling of said Lakers, will join forces with Kobe, forming a hall of fame backcourt. I don't see either of those moves happening for a variety of reasons including other teams having more to offer, a new CBA and the Lakers being capped out until my 2 year old nephew can legally buy a Playboy. (Luke Walton will make $6,100,000 in 2012-2013).

According to Hoopshype.com, the Lakers have $89 million committed in salary next season. If Shannon Brown and Matt Barnes opt into their contracts that number rises to $92 million and change. Hell, the Lakers will have $61,466,130 committed in salary for the 2013-2014 season! With the CBA in limbo, the Lakers could be saddled with the same team, a new coach and a strike shortened season.

I do believe changes will be made this offseason. The Mavs exposed the Lakers as old, slow and defensively challenged. The good news for Lakers fans is that this trifecta of problems can be fixed on the cheap. They already have two quality big men and veteran leadership. Plus, Kobe can still find ways to score. But Lakers fans do not want to hear "on the cheap." Rare is it that "on the cheap" wins rings. The Lakers could use a second scorer at the small forward spot to take some of the pressure off of Kobe. But again, second scorers are way overpriced in the NBA. Rudy Gay and Andre Iguodala are second scorers. Gay will make $15,032,144 next season. Iguodala still has three years and $56 million left on his deal.

Unfortunately, with the number one payroll in the NBA ($91,645,878) and cap uncertainty, Dwight Howard and/or CP3 are all but out of the picture unless they force their respective teams to deal them to the Lakers in a Melo-like move. The Magic and Hornets will not be as patient as the Nuggets were with Melo and would likely pull the trigger on the best deal available, like the shocker the Jazz pulled with Deron Williams. The Lakers can move Gasol, who will be 32 in 2012 (and seemingly on the decline) or Andrew Bynum, who has shown flashes of greatness but cannot seem to stay on the floor due to various knee injuries, but little else.

The Lakers do not have any young talent, draft picks, or attractive contracts to offer Orlando for Howard or New Orleans for CP3. Also, keep in mind that the other 29 teams in the NBA currently own the New Orleans Hornets. I doubt they would sign off on a deal that sends its face of the franchise and lone marketing tool to LA.

Look, Gasol played terribly throughout the entire playoffs. He was soft, taking every hit the Mavs gave him without ever hitting back. He looked lost on defense and lethargic on offense. Maybe he was just worn out. Maybe, as he hinted in the Mavs series, he let outside influences seep into his mind. Maybe he was mentally worn out? I will not speculate what those outside influences were. But hopefully they disappear by November 2011.

So what do the Lakers need? An infusion of inexpensive youth and athleticism at the point guard and wing positions. The Lakers can improve via free agency and the draft next season, assuming there is a mid-level exception, which is a major assumption. Here are a few summer 2011 free agents I think the Lakers should take a hard look at this offseason. You won't find a point guard on this list. I know the Lakers need a point guard, but Derek Fisher has a player option for the 2012-2013 season and Steve Blake is signed through 2013-2014, plus there weren't many attractive point guards on the 2011 FA market anyway. Perhaps a deal for Raymond Felton is a possibility due to the Nugs having Ty Lawson.

J.R. Smith - Nuggets
Position: Shooting Guard
2010-2011 Salary: $6,031,851
J.R. Smith would likely cost the Lakers the full mid-level exception. Still, the Lakers need youth and athleticism and Smith fits the bill. He can create his own shot and fill it up when Bryant is on the bench. He shot 39% from three and has the ability to jump out the damn building, giving Kobe some relief on the offsensive end. What the Lakers do not need is a headache and Smith was known for being in and out of George Karl's doghouse throughout his Denver career. He is basically Shannon Brown with a jumpshot and a worse attitude. Still, if Brown opts out, Smith could work here.

Reggie Williams - Warriors
Position: Shooting Guard/Small Forward
2010-2011 Salary: $762,195
Like J.R. Smith, Reggie Williams can fill it up. When given the opportunity, Williams performed. He averaged 16.5 pts/gm when playing 25 minutes or more. A pure shooter, Williams shot 47% from the field and 42.3% from 3. At 24, his best years are still be ahead of him.

Gary Forbes - Nuggets
Position: Shooting Guard/Small Forward
Salary: $473,604
Gary Forbes is a solid 6'7'' 220. Like Reggie Williams, Forbes, the UMass product, is cheap, young and can shoot the ball when given minutes. Forbes played 20 minutes or more 14 times for the Nuggets this season and averaged 11.5 points a game. I like his size and although he's raw, he can defend chest to chest with his opponent. The Lakers need more glue-guys like Forbes who have scratched and clawed their way into the league and are happy to do the little things if it means they get a paycheck every two weeks. Not many blue-collar guys on the roster right now for L.A.

Luc Mbah a Moute - Bucks
Position:Small Forward/Power Forward
Salary: $854,389
The 6'8'' 220 UCLA product would be a steal for the Lakers. Mbah a Moute, a second round pick, played 79 games and multiple positions for the injury plagued Bucks, often defending the opponents best big man. The problem is where and when would he play? He's not a shooter and would likely play the backup power forward spot. With Lamar Odom locked in through 2012-2013, I'm not sure there is room for Mbah a Moute in L.A. Still, if the Lakers are serious about improving on the defensive end, they should take a look at Luc.

Derrick Brown - Knicks
Position: Small Forward/Power Forward
Salary: $287,940
Throw out the stats here because they aren't impressive. There are more talented players out there that may have more of an initial impact than Derrick Brown. But I watched this Xavier product give it to my Saint Joseph's Hawks for years. I always came away impressed with Brown's athleticism. He was drafted in the second round by Charlotte and was thought to be one of the steals of 2009 draft. Never panned out. But LB is known for destroying young players careers. He is only 23 and has the athleticism at 6'8'' 220 to make an impact for a team in the years to come. He may be a Trevor Ariza-type player, we may never hear from him again. I have no idea, but at that price why not take a shot?

The Life and Times of a Walk-On

A trail of sweat slowly flowed down Taylor Trevisan’s exhausted body. Each drop followed his every step as he walked down the corridor that leads to the office of head coach and face of the Saint Joseph’s University men’s basketball team, Phil Martelli. Each step brought him a foot closer to a life-altering decision. But the call was not his. The decision was out of his hands.

Trevisan had just completed an open tryout with the men’s basketball team. Before fall break, the men’s basketball team holds an open tryout with 20-30 prospective walk-ons. Walk-ons rarely play in games. They are what some refer to as practice bodies. Trevisan knew this. In fact, he knew the entire open tryout routine. This was his second open tryout with the Hawks. He had been through this nerve-racking experience his freshman year and it did not end well. Trevisan was informed he did not make the team, no one had.

                                                                                                                          

“I played on the Hawks’ club JV team, so I was still playing basketball,” he said. “I never told myself I wasn’t going to try again. There was never a doubt in my mind. I just kept working at it”

Trevisan, a six-foot two-inch guard from West Chester, Pa., brought that experience with him to the open tryout his sophomore year. The tryouts consist of mini-games between players. The players compete in two on two, three on three, or four on four games. There are little to no drills during the initial tryouts. Coaches want to see if any of these guys can play, not if they can dribble with their off-hand.

“The coaches saw how you played in different situations,” Trevisan explained. “They were looking for knowledge of the game during live game action. You would think there would be a lot of drills, but that wasn’t the case.”

Mentality is crucial during a basketball tryout. The player’s game-plan walking into the gym will likely determine whether he makes the team or watches from the stands for the upcoming season. Some players take every shot. They believe the more points they score the greater possibility of standing out. Trevisan’s mentality was different. Selfish play will get a player nowhere in Phil Martelli’ system. His plan of attack was simple: play as hard as humanly possible. He never worried about his shot.

“Shots will fall, you’ll get your shots,” he said. “My main thing was bust my butt every minute. I told myself not to leave anything out there.  Hustle, dive for balls, box out, talk on defense. These little things set you apart from the man next to you.”

Trevisan and one other hopeful were the only players that were asked back to practice with the team over fall break. They survived first cuts. Practices at 6:30 am were the norm. More drills. More game situations. The next step was passing the eye test — does he look like he can play with the big boys? 

“My biggest worry was making sure I woke up in time for those early practices,” he joked.

After the practices during fall break, Trevisian was asked into the coach’s office. It was decision time.

“Coach Martelli first asked me about my schedule for classes,” Trevisan recalled. “He was like ‘so what do you have Monday and Tuesday?’ I mean, we got all the way to Friday.”

Inside, Trevisan was a mess. But he calmly listed off his classes to coach Martelli, somehow recalling each class for each day. Finally, coach Martelli informed Taylor that he had made the team and congratulated him.

“I was trying to hold it all in,” he said. “I was trying to hold myself back from hugging him.

I called my family right afterwards and they were so happy for me.”

In high school, Trevisan was captain of the basketball team and probably could have played at smaller division III schools, where he would likely get more playing time. But Trevisan never regretted his decision to walk on. After being told he was on the team, he called his coach at Salesianum High School in Delaware, Mike Gallagher.

“I gave him a call right after I found out,” he said. “I thanked him. My high school coach was a great influence on me. He was extremely excited and proud. I visited coaches from freshman ball all the way up just to thank them.”

Trevisan made the team because the coaches knew he would provide the highest energy to every practice every day. That was his role on the team — play each practice like a Big 5 game at the Palestra. Playing time is relative for a Division I walk-on.

“I try to bring an intensity and competitiveness for everyone else so they all get more out of the practice and get ready for the game,” he said. "Practices are my games."

His perseverance paid off as he played in four games last season for the Hawks. At the team’s end of the season awards banquet, Trevisan was the recipient of the Daniel J. Cummins, Jr. Memorial Award for spirit. He credited his teammates and coach Martelli for the honor and for his incredible ride that will ultimately continue next season.

“He’s helped me from the little technical aspects of my shot, to my defense,” Trevisan said. "He’ll yell at me just like any other guy for slacking off.”

When asked what he would tell other athletes who had aspirations of walking on, Trevisan’s answer was simple — slackers need not apply.

“Work now,” he said. “Start now. Don’t show up a month before tryouts and try to make it. You have to start in the summer and work your tail off.”